Washington [Archive] - Sports-Boards

PDA

View Full Version : Washington


Pitpen
03-13-2005, 05:15 PM
Gets a 1 seed.

*shakes head*

Enyalois
03-13-2005, 05:17 PM
Gets a 1 seed.

*shakes head*
Why not?

I would rather see Washington with it instead of a thrid ACC team.

HamelsToe
03-13-2005, 05:17 PM
Wha?

The selection show is on already?!!

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 05:17 PM
Why not?

I would rather see Washington with it instead of a thrid ACC team.
There were other teams that could have gotten it.

Enyalois
03-13-2005, 05:20 PM
Wha?

The selection show is on already?!!
CBS


There were other teams that could have gotten it. Yes, but Washington is just as deserving.

HamelsToe
03-13-2005, 05:20 PM
Dam

Pitt is starting out against Pacific. GO PANTHERS!

HamelsToe
03-13-2005, 05:24 PM
Albequerque looks like a really good bracket

Lots of potential upsets. GW and GA Tech, that should be a great game

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 05:26 PM
Maryland=NIT Champs.

JRoll
03-13-2005, 05:27 PM
Maryland=NIT Champs.
Damn right!

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 05:28 PM
Damn right!
UAB already made it, taking Maryland's potential spot.

JRoll
03-13-2005, 05:29 PM
UAB already made it, taking Maryland's potential spot.
Did ND make it yet?

HamelsToe
03-13-2005, 05:29 PM
ISU vs. Minny

That's a great matchup, WOOOOO NOVA, beat the Mexicans!

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 05:29 PM
Did ND make it yet?
I don't think so.

JRoll
03-13-2005, 05:29 PM
I don't think so.
Those are the 2 teams that were battling for a spot.

Enyalois
03-13-2005, 05:30 PM
Maryland=NIT Champs.
What makes you so sure they'll be invited?

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 05:30 PM
Those are the 2 teams that were battling for a spot.
Northern Iowa too.

They just made it.

HamelsToe
03-13-2005, 05:31 PM
These shots of the exicted teams are always stupid. I would only take video of a team who is on the bubble, it's fun to watch their reaction

JRoll
03-13-2005, 05:31 PM
Northern Iowa too.

They just made it.
Yeah...Maryland is screwed.

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 05:32 PM
Stick a fork in 'em, baby!!!

Pull a Clemson!!!

HamelsToe
03-13-2005, 05:33 PM
Hey Pit, I think the Hens are a bubble team...

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 05:35 PM
Hey Pit, I think the Hens are a bubble team...
They should have been a bubble team for the CAA tourney.

HamelsToe
03-13-2005, 05:36 PM
WOOOOOOOO DSU!

Beat the Dookies!

Enyalois
03-13-2005, 05:37 PM
WOOOOOOOO DSU!

Beat the Dookies!
Cuse got that bracket.

JRoll
03-13-2005, 05:38 PM
Yeah...Maryland is screwed.
Iowa was the team that screwed them.

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 05:39 PM
Iowa was the team that screwed them.
Nah...it was UAB. Their best win this year was Clemson.

HamelsToe
03-13-2005, 05:39 PM
Cuse got that bracket.
This bracket is up for grabs. Dook, UK, Cuse, Iowa can all go deep

I think it's between Cuse and Dook. Cuse will take it

Domino427
03-13-2005, 05:40 PM
Iowa was the team that screwed them.
and a lot of teams...no way are they a 10...its just cuz they play in the Big Ten...i dont understand how a "bubble team" gets a 10 seed...to me, shouldnt they be like a 15 or 16 if they're that questionable?

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 05:40 PM
and a lot of teams...no way are they a 10...its just cuz they play in the Big Ten...i dont understand how a "bubble team" gets a 10 seed...to me, shouldnt they be like a 15 or 16 if they're that questionable?
No, that goes to shitty conference champions.

HamelsToe
03-13-2005, 05:41 PM
and a lot of teams...no way are they a 10...its just cuz they play in the Big Ten...i dont understand how a "bubble team" gets a 10 seed...to me, shouldnt they be like a 15 or 16 if they're that questionable?
Those are reserved for loser conference winners. Like DSU

Enyalois
03-13-2005, 05:41 PM
and a lot of teams...no way are they a 10...its just cuz they play in the Big Ten...i dont understand how a "bubble team" gets a 10 seed...to me, shouldnt they be like a 15 or 16 if they're that questionable?
No, 15-16 is reserved for teams from shitty leagues that only get in because of the automatic bid.

HamelsToe
03-13-2005, 05:42 PM
I think ODU has a shot at beating Cuse

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 05:43 PM
Delaware State will beat Duke.

Domino427
03-13-2005, 05:43 PM
I know that...but still, teams w/that many losses should be seeded that high...you guys have you trained to think that way...i guess my point is why the hell is a team like Iowa seeded over a team like New Mexico?

Or BC, who lost in the first round, getting a same seed as 'Cuse? Higher than a 'Nova team that beat them? It's just some bogus shit...its all based on the conference they play in, not how good the team has performed

JRoll
03-13-2005, 05:45 PM
If they both make it that far, Duke and UNC matchup in the final 4.

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 05:45 PM
I know that...but still, teams w/that many losses should be seeded that high...you guys have you trained to think that way...i guess my point is why the hell is a team like Iowa seeded over a team like New Mexico?

Or BC, who lost in the first round, getting a same seed as 'Cuse? Higher than a 'Nova team that beat them? It's just some bogus shit...its all based on the conference they play in, not how good the team has performed
I think it's based on who's the better team. Iowa is much better than Delaware State and Oakland.

Villanova wasn't great early in the season, so they dropped a spot. Syracuse wasn't great for a period and suffered.

Domino427
03-13-2005, 05:45 PM
And a ranked team w/only 3 losses, like Pacific, only gets an 8?

So now they have to play Illinois if they win...thas not right...give them like a 5 or a 6...hell even a 7 in a better bracket

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 05:46 PM
If they both make it that far, Duke and UNC matchup in the final 4.
Duke won't make it that far. No way. Duke is a fraud and was exposed by Maryland and Va. Tech.

On an unrelated note, it's going to be weird watching the NIT. Never done that before.

Enyalois
03-13-2005, 05:47 PM
If they both make it that far, Duke and UNC matchup in the final 4.
One will, the other won't.

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 05:49 PM
And a ranked team w/only 3 losses, like Pacific, only gets an 8?

So now they have to play Illinois if they win...thas not right...give them like a 5 or a 6...hell even a 7 in a better bracket
http://pacifictigers.collegesports.com/sports/m-baskbl/sched/paci-m-baskbl-sched.html

Look at their schedule. The played like 1 or 2 teams that made the tournament. If Maryland or Notre Dame plays that schedule, they have no more than 2 losses.

asheylarry
03-13-2005, 06:35 PM
I think it's based on who's the better team. Iowa is much better than Delaware State and Oakland.

Villanova wasn't great early in the season, so they dropped a spot. Syracuse wasn't great for a period and suffered.
if duke is a #1 seed 'Nova should be a #1 seed. what a joke. how the hell is florida a #4 and 'Nova a #5? unbelievable. can't wait til 'Nova sends UNC packing.

asheylarry
03-13-2005, 06:37 PM
if duke is a #1 seed 'Nova should be a #1 seed. what a joke. how the hell is florida a #4 and 'Nova a #5? unbelievable. can't wait til 'Nova sends UNC packing.
if GT is a #5 'Nova should be a #1. that's the biggest joke of all.

local news reporter seriously just said, "If I was UCONN I wouldn't want to play UCF right now."

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 06:39 PM
if duke is a #1 seed 'Nova should be a #1 seed. what a joke. how the hell is florida a #4 and 'Nova a #5? unbelievable. can't wait til 'Nova sends UNC packing.
Conference tournament play.

The 2 teams you're talking about one their tournaments, beating at least 2 teams that will be in the NCAA tournament.

Nova didn't.

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 06:39 PM
if GT is a #5 'Nova should be a #1. that's the biggest joke of all.

local news reporter seriously just said, "If I was UCONN I wouldn't want to play UCF right now."
If I was UCF, I would be happy to score 45 points.

PhilaVa
03-13-2005, 06:43 PM
Maryland=NIT Champs.
Better hope someone knocks Clemson out so they don't have to face them.

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 06:44 PM
Better hope someone knocks Clemson out so they don't have to face them.
Just feel lucky Maryland and Va. Tech didn't make the NCAA tournament.

asheylarry
03-13-2005, 06:45 PM
Conference tournament play.

The 2 teams you're talking about one their tournaments, beating at least 2 teams that will be in the NCAA tournament.

Nova didn't.
explain 'cuse seed then.

PhilaVa
03-13-2005, 06:45 PM
if duke is a #1 seed 'Nova should be a #1 seed. what a joke. how the hell is florida a #4 and 'Nova a #5? unbelievable. can't wait til 'Nova sends UNC packing.
Yeah, the Champions of the highest rated conference, a team with a SOS of 4, an RPI of 5 is a number one seed, what a joke.

PhilaVa
03-13-2005, 06:46 PM
Just feel lucky Maryland and Va. Tech didn't make the NCAA tournament.
You know it's bad when you're using your own team as the joke.

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 06:48 PM
explain 'cuse seed then.
6 losses and a terrible, terrible out of conference schedule.

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 06:48 PM
You know it's bad when you're using your own team as the joke.
No...the joke is that Duke lost 60% of their games to them this year.

PhilaVa
03-13-2005, 06:49 PM
No...the joke is that Duke lost 60% of their games to them this year.
You Maryland fans going riot after your first round NIT win, or loss?

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 06:52 PM
You Maryland fans going riot after your first round NIT win, or loss?
Loss, I would imagine.

I've never watched an NIT game. Should be an interesting experience. Maybe Gary can call coach K and ask what it's like to be in the NIT. After all, this is Maryland's first trip in 12 years.

asheylarry
03-13-2005, 06:52 PM
Yeah, the Champions of the highest rated conference, a team with a SOS of 4, an RPI of 5 is a number one seed, what a joke.
again the same rpi that has the pac-10 rated #2.

asheylarry
03-13-2005, 06:53 PM
6 losses and a terrible, terrible out of conference schedule.
yes but what about conference tourney play?

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 06:54 PM
yes but what about conference tourney play?
It only means so much.

PhilaVa
03-13-2005, 06:55 PM
Loss, I would imagine.

I've never watched an NIT game. Should be an interesting experience. Maybe Gary can call coach K and ask what it's like to be in the NIT. After all, this is Maryland's first trip in 12 years.
Be nice to see if the Maryland fans will show up to the games, I doubt it.

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 06:57 PM
Be nice to see if the Maryland fans will show up to the games, I doubt it.
I guess that depends where they are played. I don't even know. I was 7 the last time Maryland played an NIT game.

Enyalois
03-13-2005, 06:58 PM
So then what the fuck did this mean?

Conference tournament play.

The 2 teams you're talking about one their tournaments, beating at least 2 teams that will be in the NCAA tournament.

Nova didn't.

PhilaVa
03-13-2005, 07:00 PM
I guess that depends where they are played. I don't even know. I was 7 the last time Maryland played an NIT game.
You act like that's some big accomplishment, like duke hasn't had a comprable record, UNC went 26 times in a row.

Quit your bitching, if you're team can't beat Clemson once in three chances you don't deserve it.

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 07:01 PM
So then what the fuck did this mean?
An extra seed or two.

I do think Syracuse deserves a three, but I don't think a 4 seed is a travesty. I would have rather seen Syracuse and UConn flip positions.

asheylarry
03-13-2005, 07:01 PM
I guess that depends where they are played. I don't even know. I was 7 the last time Maryland played an NIT game.
all games before final 4 are at higher seeds home.

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 07:03 PM
You act like that's some big accomplishment, like duke hasn't had a comprable record, UNC went 26 times in a row.

Quit your bitching, if you're team can't beat Clemson once in three chances you don't deserve it.
Maybe Ashey has a point. Your team couldn't beat the team that couldn't beat Clemson in three tries in 2 tries. Do they deserve a 1 seed when the team that beat them twice didn't get into the tournament, by that logic? Should Clemson be a 1 seed too?

Enyalois
03-13-2005, 07:03 PM
An extra seed or two.

I do think Syracuse deserves a three, but I don't think a 4 seed is a travesty. I would have rather seen Syracuse and UConn flip positions.
Either way I think Cuse takes that bracket.

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 07:03 PM
all games before final 4 are at higher seeds home.
I see. I would imagine they will all be at Maryland.

Phila, they'll all be sellouts.

PhilaVa
03-13-2005, 07:05 PM
I see. I would imagine they will all be at Maryland.

Phila, they'll all be sellouts.
You sure, earlier this year Gary took a shot at the fans for not showing up because things weren't going well. I'm not sure the Maryland "fans" will be up for the NIT tourney.

asheylarry
03-13-2005, 07:05 PM
Maybe Ashey has a point. Your team couldn't beat the team that couldn't beat Clemson in three tries in 2 tries. Do they deserve a 1 seed when the team that beat them twice didn't get into the tournament, by that logic? Should Clemson be a 1 seed too?
and bingo was his name-o

Enyalois
03-13-2005, 07:07 PM
I see. I would imagine they will all be at Maryland.

Phila, they'll all be sellouts.
I still don't see why you're assuming Maryland will even be invited.

PhilaVa
03-13-2005, 07:08 PM
I still don't see why you're assuming Maryland will even be invited.
I bet Clemson's invite goes in the mail first...

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 07:12 PM
I still don't see why you're assuming Maryland will even be invited.
Because their RPI is probably better than a third of the teams in the tournament.

Also, their SOS is better than 80%, at least.

Most importantly, they're undefeated against one of the number one seeds.

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 07:13 PM
You sure, earlier this year Gary took a shot at the fans for not showing up because things weren't going well. I'm not sure the Maryland "fans" will be up for the NIT tourney.
I've never heard of such claims. Maryland averaged a sellout this year. Try getting a ticket to one of their games after the start of the season and you'll be disappointed.

Fan
03-13-2005, 07:14 PM
Because their RPI is probably better than a third of the teams in the tournament.

Also, their SOS is better than 80%, at least.

Most importantly, they're undefeated against one of the number one seeds.
Are they more or less likely to make the NIT more or less cash?


They be in. They better pack the house.

PhilaVa
03-13-2005, 07:16 PM
I've never heard of such claims. Maryland averaged a sellout this year. Try getting a ticket to one of their games after the start of the season and you'll be disappointed.
It happened. Sometime before the Duke game, I remember the quote. It was about the same time Medley was crying about the media.

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 07:16 PM
Are they more or less likely to make the NIT more or less cash?


They be in. They better pack the house.
They will. Half the tickets are already sold to all of their games through sponsorships, which is one of the reason why Phila's claims are so baseless.

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 07:17 PM
It happened. Sometime before the Duke game, I remember the quote. It was about the same time Medley was crying about the media.
That would have been before Reddick bitched for ten minutes on Sportscenter about being booed?

PhilaVa
03-13-2005, 07:19 PM
That would have been before Reddick bitched for ten minutes on Sportscenter about being booed?
Why are you so bitter? Because he led the ACC in scoring?

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 07:19 PM
Why are you so bitter? Because he led the ACC in scoring?
I'm not bitter. You started this.

I'll say it again, my first posts on this subject were defending Duke's 1 seed.

PhilaVa
03-13-2005, 07:21 PM
I'm not bitter. You started this.

I'll say it again, my first posts on this subject were defending Duke's 1 seed.
I talk about how Maryland fans had trouble showing up for non-important games this year, and wondering if they'll find the NIT important enough and you turn it into a JJ bitching post?

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 07:22 PM
I talk about how Maryland fans had trouble showing up for non-important games this year, and wondering if they'll find the NIT important enough and you turn it into a JJ bitching post?
You turned your posts into a Gary and Caner-Medley bitch post.

PhilaVa
03-13-2005, 07:26 PM
You turned your posts into a Gary and Caner-Medley bitch post.
You're so lame, I was pointing out that Gary had mentioned that the kids weren't showing up to the games because Maryland was struggling, I gave it context for you it was before the duke game about the two week period in which Medley was having fits with the media. Maryland students get the tickets, it says sellout but they weren't showing up. I think it's a reasonable question to ask whether or not they'll feel they need to show up to support their team in the NIT. Gary called them out, and I loved it...he is a great coach. Stop being a whiney bitch.

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 07:28 PM
You're so lame, I was pointing out that Gary had mentioned that the kids weren't showing up to the games because Maryland was struggling, I gave it context for you it was before the duke game about the two week period in which Medley was having fits with the media. Maryland students get the tickets, it says sellout but they weren't showing up. I think it's a reasonable question to ask whether or not they'll feel they need to show up to support their team in the NIT. Gary called them out, and I loved it...he is a great coach. Stop being a whiney bitch.
I said nothing about Reddick that you didn't say about Caner-Medley.

PhilaVa
03-13-2005, 07:28 PM
I said nothing about Reddick that you didn't say about Caner-Medley.
You're five now? Whatever, good luck in the NIT.

Pitpen
03-13-2005, 07:29 PM
You're five now? Whatever, good luck in the NIT.
In that case, we're both 5.

Good luck against Del. State. Duke will need it. They roll hard.

Boik14 is the shiz
03-14-2005, 12:30 AM
Cuse got that bracket.I love cuse but we got fucked hard in that bracket. Vermont is a good team and Taylor Cppenwrath can possibly pull an upset. then Mich State, Duke and probably Kentucky for the bottom half just to reach the final 4. Ouch.

Boik14 is the shiz
03-14-2005, 12:34 AM
explain 'cuse seed then.Exactly. The conference champ from 1 of the top 2 (not starting a BE/ACC debate) conferences in the country only gets a 4 seed. Holy christ, this is blasphemy.

PhilaVa
03-14-2005, 12:39 AM
Exactly. The conference champ from 1 of the top 2 (not starting a BE/ACC debate) conferences in the country only gets a 4 seed. Holy christ, this is blasphemy.
Cuse lost every big matchup they had the entire year in the big east, that's why they are only ranked as a 4 seed. Duke had beaten two teams in the top 5 before the conference tournament had even begun.

jcarm22
03-14-2005, 12:41 AM
Cuse lost every big matchup they had the entire year in the big east, that's why they are only ranked as a 4 seed. Duke had beaten two teams in the top 5 before the conference tournament had even begun. What does this have to do with Washington getting a #1 seed?

Boik14 is the shiz
03-14-2005, 12:42 AM
Cuse lost every big matchup they had the entire year in the big east, that's why they are only ranked as a 4 seed. Duke had beaten two teams in the top 5 before the conference tournament had even begun.uhhhh Uconn, raped nova and finished 3rd in the toughest conference in the country. Duke is gonna get OWNED

PhilaVa
03-14-2005, 12:43 AM
uhhhh Uconn, raped nova and finished 3rd in the toughest conference in the country. Duke is gonna get OWNED
Read my post before you comment please.

Boik14 is the shiz
03-14-2005, 12:43 AM
Cuse lost every big matchup they had the entire year in the big east, that's why they are only ranked as a 4 seed. Duke had beaten two teams in the top 5 before the conference tournament had even begun.oh and didnt duke struggle like hell against a garbage st johns team? The worst team in the Big East? LOL

Boik14 is the shiz
03-14-2005, 12:45 AM
Read my post before you comment please.And maybe you should read mine before you commented. It had nothing to do with duke. Do i think cuse will beat them, yes, bnut i was bitching mostly about washington being a #1 seed.

PhilaVa
03-14-2005, 12:45 AM
oh and didnt duke struggle like hell against a garbage st johns team? The worst team in the Big East? LOLYes, duke 'struggled' to beat a St. Johns team. I watched that game, Duke looked like they were asleep, I believe Reddick and Ewing were like 1 for 22 at one point and they still cruised to victory. You make an excellent point however. Well, not really.

PhilaVa
03-14-2005, 12:46 AM
And maybe you should read mine before you commented. It had nothing to do with duke. Do i think cuse will beat them, yes, bnut i was bitching mostly about washington being a #1 seed.
I was just explaining why Cuse got the seed that they got. I threw in the Duke comments to

a.) piss people off
b.) piss people off

Tough choice, but the choice is yours...

Boik14 is the shiz
03-14-2005, 12:47 AM
Yes, duke 'struggled' to beat a St. Johns team. I watched that game, Duke looked like they were asleep, I believe Reddick and Ewing were like 1 for 22 at one point and they still cruised to victory. You make an excellent point however. Well, not really.Lets see, you barely beat the worst team in the best conference in the country. St Johns has exactly 1 good player and they still made it tight. Yep i think its a very valid point.

BE > ACC (8-3)

Owned. Next.

Boik14 is the shiz
03-14-2005, 12:49 AM
I was just explaining why Cuse got the seed that they got. I threw in the Duke comments to

a.) piss people off
b.) piss people off

Tough choice, but the choice is yours...Your opinion = worthless to me. Thanks though

PhilaVa
03-14-2005, 12:51 AM
Lets see, you barely beat the worst team in the best conference in the country. St Johns has exactly 1 good player and they still made it tight. Yep i think its a very valid point.

BE > ACC (8-3)

Owned. Next.
Owned?

apparently you aren't reading very well so I'll say it again. Duke's two best players had perhaps their worst games of the year and still didn't have much trouble winning that game. This is a perfect example of why the ACC is better than Big East, Duke should have lost that game.

PhilaVa
03-14-2005, 12:52 AM
Your opinion = worthless to me. Thanks though
Perhaps that is why you continue to respond to me. Show me some more love.

Boik14 is the shiz
03-14-2005, 01:00 AM
Owned?

apparently you aren't reading very well so I'll say it again. Duke's two best players had perhaps their worst games of the year and still didn't have much trouble winning that game. This is a perfect example of why the ACC is better than Big East, Duke should have lost that game.LOL. Your logic gets funnier and funnier. The fact that you admit Duke should have lost any game to the worst team in the BE shows youre talking out of your ass. Sorry man, Im done with you. Ive got better things to do, like bitch about how washington shouldnt be a #1 seed if the other 63 schools in tourney got uninvited.

PhilaVa
03-14-2005, 01:03 AM
LOL. Your logic gets funnier and funnier. The fact that you admit Duke should have lost any game to the worst team in the BE shows youre talking out of your ass. Sorry man, Im done with you. Ive got better things to do, like bitch about how washington shouldnt be a #1 seed if the other 63 schools in tourney got uninvited.
Any competent basketball team should have beat Duke that day, a day in which JJ and Ewing were combined 0 for 22 late into the second half...so what does it exactly prove. Duke is that good to still win, or St. Johns is that bad that they couldn't beat Duke at their worst.

asheylarry
03-14-2005, 10:20 AM
Cuse lost every big matchup they had the entire year in the big east, that's why they are only ranked as a 4 seed. Duke had beaten two teams in the top 5 before the conference tournament had even begun.
'nova beat two top 5 teams in the regular seasons and made it to the semis of the conference tourney. you're telling me the difference b/t a 1 and a 5 is two wins against nc state and gt? syracuse beat a uconn team that was as hot as anybody in the country and a wvu that after underachieving for the 1st half of the season is playing up to expectations and also was very hot. you're really saying that the difference b/t a 1 and a 4 is two conference wins at home? everyone's bitching about washington getting a #1, duke getting one is just as laughable.

asheylarry
03-14-2005, 10:21 AM
Yes, duke 'struggled' to beat a St. Johns team. I watched that game, Duke looked like they were asleep, I believe Reddick and Ewing were like 1 for 22 at one point and they still cruised to victory. You make an excellent point however. Well, not really.
you didn't watch the game if you're saying they cruised to victory.

JLove22
03-14-2005, 11:01 AM
'nova beat two top 5 teams in the regular seasons and made it to the semis of the conference tourney. you're telling me the difference b/t a 1 and a 5 is two wins against nc state and gt? syracuse beat a uconn team that was as hot as anybody in the country and a wvu that after underachieving for the 1st half of the season is playing up to expectations and also was very hot. you're really saying that the difference b/t a 1 and a 4 is two conference wins at home? everyone's bitching about washington getting a #1, duke getting one is just as laughable.
alot of teams could have deserved a number 1 seed, thats why there is such little differences between 1 and 4 seeds, comes down to what have you done lately, duke won its conference tournament, washington won its conference tournament, duke also has some big wins and the name recognition, duke beat a gt team that was as hot as anybody and a ncsu team taht after underachieving for the 1st half of the season is playing up to expectations and also was very hot, notice the similarity...duke beat a 5 seed three times, split with a 1 and a 2, swept a 10, beat a 5, and beat a 3, and won the toughest conference's tournament, hardly laughable

asheylarry
03-14-2005, 11:06 AM
alot of teams could have deserved a number 1 seed, thats why there is such little differences between 1 and 4 seeds, comes down to what have you done lately, duke won its conference tournament, washington won its conference tournament, duke also has some big wins and the name recognition, duke beat a gt team that was as hot as anybody and a ncsu team taht after underachieving for the 1st half of the season is playing up to expectations and also was very hot, notice the similarity...duke beat a 5 seed three times, split with a 1 and a 2, swept a 10, beat a 5, and beat a 3, and won the toughest conference's tournament, hardly laughablegt and nc state are not remotely comparable to uconn and wvu. also gt being a 5 may be the biggest joke of all.

asheylarry
03-14-2005, 11:07 AM
and duke didn't win the toughest conference's tournament because they don't play in the big east.

JLove22
03-14-2005, 11:08 AM
gt and nc state are not remotely comparable to uconn and wvu. also gt being a 5 may be the biggest joke of all.
gt beat one of the best teams in the nation the day before...i would say they were playing pretty well

JLove22
03-14-2005, 11:09 AM
and duke didn't win the toughest conference's tournament because they don't play in the big east.
right well apparently the selection committee and panel of experts dont agree with you on that one and honestly what they think actually matters

BambinoBear
03-14-2005, 11:11 AM
gt and nc state are not remotely comparable to uconn and wvu. also gt being a 5 may be the biggest joke of all.
I'll give you uconn, but west virginia????????? gt and nc state are better then wv.

asheylarry
03-14-2005, 11:12 AM
gt beat one of the best teams in the nation the day before...i would say they were playing pretty well
not as well as uconn.

asheylarry
03-14-2005, 11:14 AM
I'll give you uconn, but west virginia????????? gt and nc state are better then wv.
explain nc states loss to wvu. also the comparison was gt-uconn, nc state-wvu. nc state blows and have chris paul to thank for being in the tourney.

JLove22
03-14-2005, 11:15 AM
explain nc states loss to wvu. also the comparison was gt-uconn, nc state-wvu. nc state blows and have chris paul to thank for being in the tourney.
im guessing you didnt watch the game because paul wouldnt have changed the outcome, state was playing really well

BambinoBear
03-14-2005, 11:17 AM
explain nc states loss to wvu. also the comparison was gt-uconn, nc state-wvu. nc state blows and have chris paul to thank for being in the tourney.
right now I would take gtech over uconn.

asheylarry
03-14-2005, 11:19 AM
im guessing you didnt watch the game because paul wouldnt have changed the outcome, state was playing really well
one of the top players in the country wouldn't have made a difference? interesting argument.

asheylarry
03-14-2005, 11:20 AM
right now I would take gtech over uconn.based on?

PhilaVa
03-14-2005, 11:20 AM
based on?Intelligence.

JLove22
03-14-2005, 11:21 AM
one of the top players in the country wouldn't have made a difference? interesting argument.
sure there would be a difference in the game but the out come would have been the same

asheylarry
03-14-2005, 11:23 AM
Intelligence.
you forgot to place "lack of" before your reply.

BambinoBear
03-14-2005, 11:24 AM
Intelligence.
Exactly! lol I just think G tech is playing there best right now and uconn kind've slid by Gtown in the big east tourney.

asheylarry
03-14-2005, 11:24 AM
sure there would be a difference in the game but the out come would have been the same
rrriiiiigghttt.

asheylarry
03-14-2005, 11:25 AM
Exactly! lol I just think G tech is playing there best right now and uconn kind've slid by Gtown in the big east tourney.
see post that preceded your reply.

BambinoBear
03-14-2005, 11:26 AM
see post that preceded your reply.That just shows what your post lack. lack of anything.....

asheylarry
03-14-2005, 11:29 AM
That just shows what your post lack. lack of anything.....
you're right. if i could only have the substance of your posts.

BambinoBear
03-14-2005, 11:31 AM
see post that preceded your reply.
And besides, last time I check you are aloud to have an opinion. That is my opinion. Sorry if i don't support my claim with stats out the ass. It's my hunch that G tech is better then uconn right now. If I'm wrong great. If I'm right great. I could really give 2 shits about it,

ToeKnee9699
03-17-2005, 04:35 PM
Washington wins.

88-77

Go Dawgs!